Aries66 wrote:Jy weet nie dalk wat die Wringkrag nou is nie?Louis
There is a simple relationship between power, torque and rotational speed, so it is possible to calculate the torque from the figures in the table that Christo published:
Note: Tables Corrected
Before New Injectors
Engine RPM, Power [hp], Power [kW],Torque [Nm]
1500, 43.2, 32.21423568, 205.0821939
2000, 88.6, 66.06901114, 315.4562912
2500, 116.2, 86.65032838, 330.979874
3000, 116.7, 87.02317833, 277.0033799
3500, 117.5, 87.61973825, 239.0591049
4000, 55.3, 41.23720447, 98.44657396
After New Injectors
Engine RPM, Power [hp], Power [kW],Torque [Nm]
1500, 47.5, 35.42074525, 225.4954678
2000, 94.3, 70.31950057, 335.7508833
2500, 123.9, 92.39221761, 352.9122753
3000, 125.7, 93.73447743, 298.3661084
3500, 123.6, 92.16850764, 251.4698329
4000, 81.3, 60.62540187, 144.7324858
I also did a curve fit to these points, which seems to indicate that the maximum power is 94 kW at 2764 rpm and the maximum torque is 359 Nm at 2318 rpm after the injector change.
It is not clear whether the figures in Christo's table are measured wheel output power values or calculated flywheel power figures. If the latter, bear in mind that several assumptions are made about the frictional losses in the drivetrain and at the tyres in order to arrive at a flywheel power figure. These assumptions are all very debatable, so these calculated flywheel power and torque figures should not really be taken to be absolutely true. Dynamometers are most useful as tools to compare the results before and after modifications (if the dyno operator is honest and the same conditions apply for the before and after runs...).
I will try to post a picture of the power and torque curves a little later.