The OE bearing has a larger radius in the inner back corner (seen in red in the picture in post 2 of this thread: http://patrol4x4.co.za/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=2994. The reason is so that the stub axle can be manufactured with a relatively large radius in the corner where this bearing is fitted, eliminating a stress-raiser and thus making the stub axle much stronger than it would otherwise have been.
However, instead of increasing the radius, the machine shop Graham used ground the back face of the bearing thinner, so that the bearing would seat further onto the hub. This had the effect that a sharp corner was created on the bearing, which was forced against the round corner of the stub axle during assembly. The results of this were firstly that the hub did not sit in it's correct position (causing problems with auto hub engagement) and secondly that where the bearing touched the stub axle there was a very high force. Since the bearing is harder than the stub axle, the bearing's sharp corner was effectively forced into the stub axle, and the result was that the bearing adjustment rapidly degraded.
All this happened litterally during the week before the vehicle was to depart in a two-week trip to Botswana, and since the vehicle in question carried the minister who was to officiate at a wedding which was the whole reason for the trip, and since Nissan didn't have any stock, this was a considerable crisis at the time and the vehicle was used in this condition, with the only precaution being to lock the front hubs manually.
Upon our return, I personally replaced the offending bearing with another pirate part, this time correctly modified, and the vehicle has been fine since (it's more than a year ago now).
So the moral of the story is, if the modification is done correctly on a quality bearing, there is absolutely no problem with using an aftermarket bearing...
