Clem wrote:I think I figured out this weekend how to get the 4.8 GRX fuel consumption down to a high 11's/low 12's per 100km while running a steady 120 to 130km/h. Seems unbelievable. Let me verify over the next six months or so and I'll let you know if I'm correct... .
Clem I forgot to ask - how long is 6 months??
I am, in confidentiality, available for a pm on interim results
Clem wrote:I think I figured out this weekend how to get the 4.8 GRX fuel consumption down to a high 11's/low 12's per 100km while running a steady 120 to 130km/h. Seems unbelievable. Let me verify over the next six months or so and I'll let you know if I'm correct... .
Clem I forgot to ask - how long is 6 months??
I am, in confidentiality, available for a pm on interim results
I think if you keep the car stock standard, no lift, no big aggro looking tyres, no bull bars and no rook-rack, then driving like a tannie can do the trick on the 4.8.
Else it will be impossible to get "big 11's/low 12's per 100km"
Vellies and Alex, you're probably not going to believe this but it seems to me that the trick is to A. Get the car to a speed where the torque converter locks up and pretty much stays locked up. B. Fold in the wing mirrors and C. Stay off the speedo cruise and let the car drift back a bit naturally on uphills (roughly maintain the throttle position and don't open up a lot more) and picks up a bit of speed on downhills. Note that the car is stock standard with highway tyres and nothing extra on the outside. Also, suspect the later 4.8 engine has been improved - heard it said in some quarters. This way, on the open road through flattish country I seem to be consistently getting 400km on the first half of my tank and over 700km just on the main tank. The science is not exact but its very consistent. Note that the wing mirrors alone seem to account for 10% or more of consumption on the standard machine. My experience in this regard is consistent with studies elsewhere - search the web and you'll see.