low range gears
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: low range gears
Just for interest sake as I believe it might be relevant
On the 4.2 Petrol at 4200 RPM, Max Power, Your speed in 5th LR would be as low as 51 KM/HR, Basically flat out.
Is that not too low?
so lets make this easy to read
4200 RPM IN 5th Gear Low Range (Flat out)
2.02 - 95 km/hr
2.484 - 77 km/hr
2.86 - 67 km/hr
3.743 - 51 km/hr
On the 4.2 Petrol at 4200 RPM, Max Power, Your speed in 5th LR would be as low as 51 KM/HR, Basically flat out.
Is that not too low?
so lets make this easy to read
4200 RPM IN 5th Gear Low Range (Flat out)
2.02 - 95 km/hr
2.484 - 77 km/hr
2.86 - 67 km/hr
3.743 - 51 km/hr
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: low range gears
Not sure what the 4.2 Diesel gear ratios are, so I left them as for the Petrol 4.2 if I had that right.
But keeping the 33 Inch tyres and working on 2000 RPM, where would you be in Low Range across the various Reduction Ratios.
My opinion is that 3.743 Reduction has its application but is way too severe.
Open to correction.
But keeping the 33 Inch tyres and working on 2000 RPM, where would you be in Low Range across the various Reduction Ratios.
My opinion is that 3.743 Reduction has its application but is way too severe.
Open to correction.
- davidvdm
- Patrolman
- Posts: 628
- Joined: 13 Sep 2011 15:47
- Full Name: David vd Merwe
- Nickname: David - Hillbilly
- Home Town: West Coast
- Current 4x4: 1997 2.7TD Nissan Sani Mk3 4x4 SFA (SAFANI)
- Home Language: English/Afrikaans
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
- Contact:
Re: low range gears
Looks like Beast and Peter have everything covered, but I'm gonna post my calculator anyways for interest sake. It reveals some other information that may be of interest to some. Allows you to input tyre size as well as torque figure to see how it translates through the drive train up to your side shafts.
- Attachments
-
- Gear ratio calcs Rev2.xlsx
- (15.42 KiB) Downloaded 203 times
David - Bfreesani
1997 Nissan Sani MK3 2.7TD - Hillbilly (SAFANI)
MQ C200 SFA
MQ H260 LSD Rear
MQ Transfer as second low range
5" Lift
33"x12.5x15" tires on 8.5J rims - Want 35's
DIY rock sliders
DIY Snorkel
Madman EMS
1997 Nissan Sani MK3 2.7TD - Hillbilly (SAFANI)
MQ C200 SFA
MQ H260 LSD Rear
MQ Transfer as second low range
5" Lift
33"x12.5x15" tires on 8.5J rims - Want 35's
DIY rock sliders
DIY Snorkel
Madman EMS
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: low range gears
David
In trying to understand your calculations with respect to TC1 & TC2 I don’t understand why the RPM outputs are the same?
Would you mind explaining/elaborate if you will?
In trying to understand your calculations with respect to TC1 & TC2 I don’t understand why the RPM outputs are the same?
Would you mind explaining/elaborate if you will?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 26 Sep 2015 23:03
- Full Name: Julian Hilder
- Nickname: none
- Home Town: Edenvale
- Current 4x4: 2018 Patrol 4.8 Vortex SuperCharged
2007 RRS 4.4 V8
2004 Colt Rodeo 3000
SIII Landy pick-up - Home Language: English
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: low range gears
i FOUND THIS
http://rber.net/gearing.php
So if you use total ratios as provided by Peter, you can set your red line, gear change point etc and determine your speed
Quite cool actually
http://rber.net/gearing.php
So if you use total ratios as provided by Peter, you can set your red line, gear change point etc and determine your speed
Quite cool actually
- davidvdm
- Patrolman
- Posts: 628
- Joined: 13 Sep 2011 15:47
- Full Name: David vd Merwe
- Nickname: David - Hillbilly
- Home Town: West Coast
- Current 4x4: 1997 2.7TD Nissan Sani Mk3 4x4 SFA (SAFANI)
- Home Language: English/Afrikaans
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
- Contact:
Re: low range gears
My setup will have two TC's and not relevant to your calcs. Thus by leaving the second TC at 1:1 and thus a straight through, it is not part of the equation and will not affect your calcs. I try and keep things "flowing", so the RPM left of TC1 is the input RPM. RPM on the right is after the reduction of the TC and the input RPM to TC2. As TC2 ratio is 1, the output RPM will be the same now.
Hope that makes sense.
I also went about a round about way to get wheel size into the calcs. It's just how I built the calcs to prove them for myself, and they just got left as is and never cleaned up, but now become handy if you change wheel size as it shows distance and speed results, which may help the guys when they want to "imagine" crawling those big rocks .
Hope that makes sense.
I also went about a round about way to get wheel size into the calcs. It's just how I built the calcs to prove them for myself, and they just got left as is and never cleaned up, but now become handy if you change wheel size as it shows distance and speed results, which may help the guys when they want to "imagine" crawling those big rocks .
David - Bfreesani
1997 Nissan Sani MK3 2.7TD - Hillbilly (SAFANI)
MQ C200 SFA
MQ H260 LSD Rear
MQ Transfer as second low range
5" Lift
33"x12.5x15" tires on 8.5J rims - Want 35's
DIY rock sliders
DIY Snorkel
Madman EMS
1997 Nissan Sani MK3 2.7TD - Hillbilly (SAFANI)
MQ C200 SFA
MQ H260 LSD Rear
MQ Transfer as second low range
5" Lift
33"x12.5x15" tires on 8.5J rims - Want 35's
DIY rock sliders
DIY Snorkel
Madman EMS
- Peter Connan
- Moderator
- Posts: 6016
- Joined: 10 Sep 2010 07:21
- Full Name: Peter Connan
- Nickname: Piet
- Home Town: Kempton Park
- Current 4x4: 1996 Patrol 4.5SGL
- Home Language: Afrikaans
- Location: Kempton Park
- Has thanked: 1067 times
- Been thanked: 987 times
Re: low range gears
Julian, remember that you still have your high range gear ratios in tact.
To my mind, if you are expecting to be able to reach 60km/h, you would probably be better off in high range.
Even with 3.735:1, you still have a lot of overlap between high and low.
Speaking for myself only, I would not be interested in a ratio higher than 3.5:1. Any less than that, and I would not be gaining enough to make the expense worth while.
Actually, at half the value of my car (the R25k you estimate), I just can't justify a set of lower ratios.
I honestly doubt such lower ratios would appreciably increase the number of places you can theoretically reach. The object is to significantly reduce the speed at which things happen, and thus increase the control you can exercise over the situation, and the ampount of speed you need to reach that torque, thus improving the wheel's ability to stay on the ground, which in turn means that traction is more constant. And therefore, it reduces the possibility of vehicle damage.
Most of the standard combinations of engine and tire (up to 33", not talking about wildly over-sized tires here) have enough torque to break traction on almost any surface I have ever driven on in 1st low at the torque peak. I don't think we actually need more torque at the wheels than that, just more control.
To my mind, if you are expecting to be able to reach 60km/h, you would probably be better off in high range.
Even with 3.735:1, you still have a lot of overlap between high and low.
Speaking for myself only, I would not be interested in a ratio higher than 3.5:1. Any less than that, and I would not be gaining enough to make the expense worth while.
Actually, at half the value of my car (the R25k you estimate), I just can't justify a set of lower ratios.
I honestly doubt such lower ratios would appreciably increase the number of places you can theoretically reach. The object is to significantly reduce the speed at which things happen, and thus increase the control you can exercise over the situation, and the ampount of speed you need to reach that torque, thus improving the wheel's ability to stay on the ground, which in turn means that traction is more constant. And therefore, it reduces the possibility of vehicle damage.
Most of the standard combinations of engine and tire (up to 33", not talking about wildly over-sized tires here) have enough torque to break traction on almost any surface I have ever driven on in 1st low at the torque peak. I don't think we actually need more torque at the wheels than that, just more control.
Mag ons ons kenniskry met lekkerkry aanhoukry.
- Peter Connan
- Moderator
- Posts: 6016
- Joined: 10 Sep 2010 07:21
- Full Name: Peter Connan
- Nickname: Piet
- Home Town: Kempton Park
- Current 4x4: 1996 Patrol 4.5SGL
- Home Language: Afrikaans
- Location: Kempton Park
- Has thanked: 1067 times
- Been thanked: 987 times
Re: low range gears
In fact, i would be inclined to say that the ideal transfer case ratio would be one where 5th low sits between 1st and 2nd high.
But then the transfer case should ideally also have synchromesh, at least on high range.
And of course, should you ever find enough traction, you would be able to destroy virtually any axle or propshaft...
But then the transfer case should ideally also have synchromesh, at least on high range.
And of course, should you ever find enough traction, you would be able to destroy virtually any axle or propshaft...
Mag ons ons kenniskry met lekkerkry aanhoukry.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests