Page 15 of 33

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 06:52
by offroadbiker
Jy moet die arme bakie eers mooi inloop voor jy rook maak :naughty:

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 07:46
by Tinus lotz
offroadbiker wrote:Jy moet die arme bakie eers mooi inloop voor jy rook maak :naughty:
Dude hy idle al vir 6 ure op mad man....lol

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 07:47
by Herrie
Ek is bly dat jy hom nou kan gebruik!! :thumbup:

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 09:18
by Michael
Russ, I believe the bigger intake only makes a real differance ona N/A engine as the engine has to do all the suck work.

On the turbo engine the turbo really doesnt struggle to get the air where it should be. I think the Ausies only start using a 3" intake when they start boosting 1.5bar+.

So far no problems from a zd30 air box and standard 4x4direct snorkel

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 09:48
by Alex Roux
Michael wrote:Russ, I believe the bigger intake only makes a real differance ona N/A engine as the engine has to do all the suck work.
On the turbo engine the turbo really doesnt struggle to get the air where it should be. I think the Ausies only start using a 3" intake when they start boosting 1.5bar+.
So far no problems from a zd30 air box and standard 4x4direct snorkel
Michael

Is this the case with petrol engines as well, as does it matter for superchargers?

On my non-aspirated petrol V8, I have tested the impact of the standard air filter on a dyno once.
It made 15kw difference taking the air straight into the engine (i.e. decoupling the pipe connecting the air filter), and putting it back on again.

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 10:56
by Michael
Alex, the petrol engines should work the same.
So even if the air is restricted on the intake side, the turbo will just compensate for this and still deliver the same amount of boost set by the actuator

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 19:25
by Peter Connan
Inlet restriction makes much more of a difference on normally aspirated engines than on forced-induction, because normally with forced-induction you are limiting the boost (IE you are not using the maximum pressure the turbo is capable of generating).

If you were not limiting the boost it would be a different story.

But I would be interested to see if reducing the restriction would not flatten the torque curve of a TDI a little bit...

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 26 Apr 2016 19:38
by Russ Kellermann
Alex Roux wrote:
Tinus lotz wrote:... slowly not missing my hilux anymore :rolleyes:
Well the bakkie won't get lost that easily anymore.
The risk of theft on the Patrol bakkie is next to nothing.
Ironically, .... My first Patrol pickup 4.2D (also a 2007 model), was stolen after 4 days of ownership, with 2 full tanks of fuel, from a very secure parking, with another R60k worth of tooling and wet weather clothing, also Garmin, leatherman and ipod.

I reckon it made its way swiftly over the border and very shortly had an anti -aircraft gun bolted to the tub.

I only did 270Km on that vehicle.

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 27 Apr 2016 07:06
by Michael
That really sucks Russ :thumbdown:

Its the first Patrol I hear of that has been stolen and its really bad that you had all those extra stuff in it.......and the two tanks of fuel which I dont know why, but I will be mostly upset about the fuel

Re: Tinus se 4.2TD bakkie!!

Posted: 27 Apr 2016 08:19
by Russ Kellermann
Hahaha. Was company fuel. not that it made a difference to my claim at all. I insured it for more than i paid for it, so luckily was able to buy the slightly newer model with full Nissan Safari Pack (full ONCA bar work etc etc and double skin load bin)